[an error occurred while processing this directive]

2.1.2 Interest Only Mortgage

  • Unlike the repayment mortgage, only interest is paid to the lender with this method.

  • The loan is repaid at the end of the term by cash taken from a suitable product which has run alongside the loan from commencement.

  • Consideration needs to be given to adequate provision of life assurance.

  • The repayment vehicle, depending on the type, may offer the opportunity of early repayment if growth of the investment element reaches the loan value before the end of the term.

  • A suitable repayment vehicle may be one of the following:-


    1. Endowment policy, where repayment is guaranteed on death provided the guaranteed sum assured matches the outstanding debt. For the full endowment, repayment is guaranteed also at maturity, but for with profits, low cost and low start endowments there is no additional guarantee, as growth depends on non guaranteed bonuses. Details of these policies can be found in Savings and Investment .

    2. Pension policy, where repayment is from the tax free retirement cash sum. Repayment on death is from a life assurance policy linked to the pension, whilst repayment at the end of the term relies on investment performance. The main disadvantage with this method is that repayment from the policy can take place only on retirement, which at its earliest is 50, and cash and pension must be taken together in most circumstances. Additionally such a policy is only suitable for those who qualify for an EPP or PPP/Stakeholder, as group occupational schemes are not usually linked to such loans. More details of pension policies can be found in Pensions.

    3. Collective Investments, where unit trusts, investment trusts and similar vehicles can be utilised as a method of providing funds at a future date to repay a mortgage. It would be prudent to take a conservative view in terms of potential growth assumptions as of course there are no guarantees regarding the eventual return or when the investment would equate to the amount borrowed. Choice of fund(s) similarly would need careful consideration. Given that the purpose of such an arrangement is redemption of a mortgage (and therefore home ownership) it is essential that prospective borrowers understand and accept fully the associated risks. Appropriate life cover would be an additional consideration and cost. Ultimately it is for the lender to decide if such a method of repayment is acceptable or otherwise. PEPs proved to be a popular method of mortgage repayment because of their tax free status (despite the investment risks). However, since 6 April 1999 borrowers have needed to turn to an alternative investment (or mortgage) as no new monies could be invested in PEPs since that date.

    4. ISAs may prove attractive to some borrowers but as with PEPs they need to be aware of the inherent investment risks (non cash ISA) and the maximum contribution limit may be a detriment to very large amounts loaned or short term mortgages. Also, the government has stated that the continuance of ISAs will be reviewed in 2009 - what of the future? Again, appropriate life assurance will need to be considered


[an error occurred while processing this directive]